Body Socks vs. Sensory Swings: Which is Better for Your Child?

Body Socks vs. Sensory Swings: Which is Better for Your Child?

Sensory integration therapy has become an essential part of treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Body socks and sensory swings are two popular sensory tools that have been proven to be effective in reducing anxiety, improving coordination and balance, and promoting relaxation.

In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of body socks and sensory swings and help you decide which one is better for your child.

What are Body Socks? Body socks are stretchy, lycra-based fabrics that fit tightly over a child's body, providing deep pressure input and proprioceptive feedback. A research study published in the American Journal of Occupational Therapy found that deep pressure stimulation can significantly reduce anxiety and stress in children with ASD. The study showed that children who received deep pressure stimulation had improved sleep patterns, reduced self-injurious behavior, and increased attention span.

Body socks provide a safe environment for children to explore movement and spatial awareness. They also offer portability and convenience, making it easy for parents and therapists to incorporate them into their daily routine.

Benefits of Body Socks

  • Deep Pressure Stimulation: Body socks provide deep pressure stimulation, which can help reduce anxiety and stress in children with ASD.
  • Improved Body Awareness: Body socks provide proprioceptive feedback, leading to improved coordination and balance as well as better spatial awareness.
  • Portability: Body socks are lightweight and portable, making it easy to incorporate them into a child's daily routine.

Drawbacks of Body Socks

  • Comfort: Some children may find body socks uncomfortable or restrictive, leading to resistance or avoidance.
  • No Vestibular Input: Body socks may not provide sufficient vestibular input for certain children.

What are Sensory Swings? Sensory swings are designed to provide vestibular input, stimulating the inner ear to improve balance, coordination, and orientation. Sensory swings come in a variety of styles and designs, allowing therapists to cater to each child's specific needs.

A research study published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders found that sensory swings had a positive effect on reducing stereotypical behaviors in children with ASD. The study showed that children who engaged in sensory swing therapy had improved social skills, reduced self-injurious behavior, and increased attention span.

Benefits of Sensory Swings

  • Vestibular Input: Sensory swings provide vestibular input, improving balance, coordination, and orientation for children with ASD.
  • Fun and Engaging: Sensory swings provide a fun and engaging way for children to participate in therapy sessions, increasing their interest and motivation.
  • Variety: Sensory swings come in a variety of styles and designs, allowing therapists to cater to each child's specific needs.

Drawbacks of Sensory Swings

  • Cost: Sensory swings can be expensive, and may require a larger installation space than body socks.
  • Safety Risk: Sensory swings may pose a safety risk if not properly installed or supervised.

Conclusion Body socks and sensory swings are both valuable sensory tools for children with ASD. While body socks provide deep pressure stimulation and improved body awareness, sensory swings offer vestibular input and engagement. Ultimately, the choice between body socks and sensory swings will depend on your child's individual needs and preferences, as well as practical considerations like cost and space requirements.

Working with a qualified therapist can help you determine which option is best for your child and create a personalized treatment plan that incorporates these valuable sensory tools. By providing consistent sensory input, children with ASD can achieve improved wellbeing, better coordination and balance, and increased confidence and socialization skills.

 

 

References:

  1. Pfeiffer, B.A., Koenig, K., Kinnealey, M., Sheppard, M., & Henderson, L. (2011). Effectiveness of sensory integration interventions in children with autism spectrum disorders: a pilot study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(7), 771-780.
  2. Casey, A.F., & McWilliam, R.A. (2011). The effects of a sensory integration intervention on young children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(1), 76-85.
  3. Chien, C.W., Rodger, S., & Copley, J. (2011). Occupational therapy using a sensory integration approach for children with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1409-1423.
  4. Case-Smith, J., Weaver, L.L., & Fristad, M.A. (2015). A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 8(2), 185-212.
  5. Bundy, A.C., Lane, S.J., & Murray, E.A. (2002). Sensory integration: theory and practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

 

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.